New Jersey Bill Aims to Stop the Sale of Dogs and Cats in Pet Stores
Animal advocates are pushing for a new law in New Jersey to stop pet shops from selling dogs, cats, and rabbits. This proposal faces opposition from business owners who fear it could force their stores to shut down, affecting consumers’ choices.
Former state Sen. Ray Lesniak, backing the bill, urged lawmakers to reconsider similar legislation he supported in 2017. This new bill aims to replace existing laws and impose stricter rules on pet stores and adoption centers.
Addressing Current Laws
The current law requires pet stores to source animals from licensed and compliant breeders. However, there are loopholes, allowing some stores to sell pets from irresponsible breeders. Advocates argue that without stronger regulations, unethical breeders from neighboring states might target New Jersey.
New Jersey considers ban on pet stores selling dogs, cats & rabbits:
PET STORE BILL: New Jersey considers ban on pet stores selling dogs, cats & rabbitshttps://t.co/j8NYx6JYLO
— News12NJ (@News12NJ) December 8, 2023
Penalties and Concerns
The proposed law would fine pet shops $500 for selling banned animals. Store owners argue the rules are too harsh and could force them to close, limiting options for those seeking specific breeds or young pets.
Opponents, like pet store owners, worry this ban would limit consumer choices and push people towards unregulated online sellers. They argue for maintaining options between adopting from shelters and buying from regulated pet stores.
The bill faced a Senate committee but didn’t secure a vote. There’s uncertainty about its future as the legislative session ends soon. Additionally, there’s no similar bill in the Assembly.
Check out some other new content we’ve published:
- New Jersey Approves Penalties for Underage Drinkers
- New Jersey Issues Warning: Numbers Not to Answer
- New Jersey’s Wildfire Threat: As Development Continues in Fire-Prone Areas
Another Big Law: Rules for Pet Groomers
Separately, another bill proposes licensing requirements for pet groomers. This measure seeks to ensure groomers pass exams, maintain proper conditions, and report incidents. However, some groomers find these rules excessive and invasive.
Opponents of the grooming bill argue it disregards experienced groomers, burdens businesses with surveillance costs, and could deter people from entering the grooming profession.
This grooming bill also awaits a committee vote, facing criticism over its impact on both business costs and animal care.
In summary, these proposed laws aim to regulate the pet industry for animal welfare but have drawn opposing views regarding their practicality and potential impact.
